AFGE Local 609
  • July 11, 2020
    Member Login
    Username:

    Password:


    Not registered yet?
    Click Here to sign-up

    Forgot Your Login?
    Site Search
    Site Map
    RSS Feeds
    UnionActive Newswire
     
    Join the Newswire!
    Updated: Jul. 10 (21:06)

    Preparation for Q2 and 3 2020 General Business Mtg. Mon. Aug 3
    IATSE Local B4
    Message from the President
    Communications Workers of America Local 1120
    2020 WSLC Endorsements
    Plumbers & Steamfitters Local 44
    Joint Council 80 Scholars
    TEAMSTERS LOCAL 577
    Please join us for the upcoming BARGAINING dates
    Los Angeles College Faculty Guild - Local 1521
    International Brotherhood of Teamsters Website
    Teamsters Local 455
     
         
    Labor Headlines

    US labor news headlines from LabourStart

    Alyssa Milano calls for sex strike, ignites social media
    China : Chinese and American Tech Workers Organize Against Overwork Through GitHub
    Twitter tears into Delta for its tone-deaf anti-union, pro-video game poster
    Home Care Workers are the Latest Vulnerable Group Under Attack by the Trump Administration
    A Union That Strikes Wins: NUHW 10 Years On
  • Garrity Rights
    Posted On: Sep 10, 2015

    Public employees have certain constitutional rights that apply in their employment that may not apply to private employees… FIFTH AMENDMENT APPLIES TO INTERROGATIONS OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES (“GARRITY RIGHTS”)

    Public employees have certain constitutional rights that apply in their employment that may not apply to private employees. For example, in Garrity v. New Jersey, 385 U.S. 493 (1967) (Argued November 10, 1966; Decided January 16, 1967), the Supreme Court held that statements obtained in the course of an investigatory interview under threat of termination from public employment couldn’t be used as evidence against the employee in subsequent criminal proceedings. If, however, you refuse to answer questions after you have been assured that your statements cannot be used against you in a subsequent criminal proceeding, the refusal to answer questions thereafter may lead to the imposition of discipline for insubordination. Further, while the statements you make may not be used against you in a subsequent criminal proceeding, they can still form the basis for discipline on the underlying work-related charge.

    To ensure that your Garrity rights are protected, you should ask the following questions: 1) If I refuse to talk, can I be disciplined for the refusal? 2) Can that discipline include termination from employment? 3) Are my answers for internal and administrative purposes only and are not to be used for criminal prosecution? If you are asked to provide a written statement regarding the subject of the interview, the following statement should be included in your report: “It is my understanding that this report is made for internal administrative purposes only. This report is made by me after being ordered to do so by my supervisor. It is my understanding that refusing to provide this report could result in my being disciplined for insubordination up to and including termination of employment. This report is made pursuant to that order and the potential discipline that could result for failing to provide this report.”


  • AFGE Local 609

    Copyright © 2020.
    All Rights Reserved.

    Powered By UnionActive


  • Top of Page image